New link in the top of page "IRC Chat".
Register | Login
Views: 124524919
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Last Posts | IRC Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album
05-03-24 09:19 AM
Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by Rauni
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
User Post
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 03-29-07 12:42 AM, in CBMMW: Bond and Lestat! Link
Originally posted by BBQMissile
Also, Lestat had his throat sliced, his body drowned, mangled and chewed up by animals, etc. etc. Taking this into account, I have no reason to doubt that he'll survive lasers. I doubt that Lestat will just stand in place to let Bond attack him with the laser though.

FIne. In this case, Lestat is a God Tier Character and James Bond is Normal Character Tier. Seeing how this tournament are completely in favor of having the God Tier to win, this give James Bond an total unfair disadvantage for killing something that can't be killed.

In short, Lestat IS an "illegal" character who pretty much have this contest won. I don't know why but you guys seem to have this tournament to be completely unbalance when it come to certain character to character. Like what you said, comparing to a God character to a normal character, hell, even throw in the popularity contest and this is what people get.

No. You guys NEED to make it as Lestat is the "God" tier character. It's like having Neo in the contest anyway.

Originally posted by Cairoi
Exactly. Note how I put Morpheus instead of Neo.

We didn't want people who rock TOO hard.

Apperantly, James is a AVERAGE tier. Making him fit the bill in there. However, you get a guy who virtually can't be killed or the only way to "defeat" Lestat is the lack of blood give him a "God" tier.

Originally posted by Sparda
However, let's look at it from your point of view. Sure, let's pretend vampires are still men. But if you do think that, you must also take into consideration that these 'men' do not die when stabbed, shot, sliced, etc. These 'men' are much stronger than their normal counterparts. What would easily send a regular man to Hades, would barely make these "men" flinch.

And vampire rules the earth, mankind was gone and life will never exist.

Very nice, Sparda, but try this. If the vampire can't die, they aren't men. But if they can, they are. Even men can be harder to kill if they have different body status. As far as I am concerned, they STILL feel the pain and that STILL make them a men.

Stabbed? Fine. Your vampire isn't a men thus a god.
Shot? Fine. Your vampire isn't a men thus a god again.
Sliced, crushed, blown into several pieces, and lost their penis? Fine. Your vampire isn't a men, and guess what? You're still a fucking god if you get away with anything uninjured.

This makes Lestat "rocks too hard" in the tournament and gave EVERYONE an unfair disadvantage because Lestat cannot be "killed".

Originally posted by Rogue
The only way Lestat can truly be beaten is if he were fighting someone after he's gone without feeding for a long time, so Bond would have to somehow restrain him for a long, long time and then either drop him in a hole and dump a whole lot of cement on it so he would never be able to get out, or find some other way to keep him down for the rest of eternity.

Pretty much the way to beat him is to delay him.

Or not. As far as I am concerned, you gave Lestat the ability to fight with full blood. Now Bond already KNEW how to fight and you technically gave him NOTHING in exchange for Lestat's ability to fight with full blood.

A huge disadvantage since you like play unfair. Since you get that, I gave James Bond his auto-lock-on-vampire-that-will-kill-every-vampire-despite-being-a-god-they-are rocket launcher. Sound unfair? Hey, we have to exchange stuff to balance the scale.

How? Let's me give you an example:

Lestat: 50 Strength with 100 HP.
Bond: 25 Strength with 200 HP.

Now you can give Lestat with +100 HP addition to equal for James Bond's HP. However, you CAN NOT SAY that James Bond won't be getting anything back either. He get +25 to his own strength because what Lestat already gotten. However, this does NOT mean I CAN give James Bond any more strength UNLESS Lestat get the bonus that are equal as well.

Originally posted by Sparda
And also, there's a flaw in your Buffy theory. Buffy is a Slayer. She has supernatural powers to fight the forces of evil. Yes, she can kick a human's ass, but the main purpose of her powers is to fight the darkness, including vampires. Her purpose is to slay vampires. Your sentence should have been phrased as such: "Buffy the Vampire slayer is skilled in killing vampires, but she often kicks human ass anyway". Bond's purpose is not to slay vampires. This is why Bond is different. And this is why Lestat would win.

Flaw or not, Bond's purpose NOW is to slay this particular vampire.

Originally posted by Rogue
How is that a "weak" point? Bond can't survive a lot of those things without some serious body armor or "gadgets." Those all happened to Lestat in previous books INCLUDING "Interview."

Are you not reading ANY of what I say before attacking my points and me, Seticus?

I'm sorry, but the reason why it IS a weak point because you already made Lestat more godly. As far as I am concerned, you already made it sounds like he's going to win this tournament (which I can see it as a great possibility) simply because James is on Average Tier.

When you use an Average Tier against a God Tier, you know that the God Tier have the best advantage over the Average, because the power the God already had. How would you feel if I picked Lestat to go against Ike from Fire Emblem 10, and Ike get to kill Lestat no matter what because Lestat's inability to withstand the God's power? It wouldn't be fair since Ike already have the battle won from the start, so that IS THE REASON WHY you put James Bond at an unfair position.

If one character get everything, the other do. In fact, Rogue. I was reading nearly everything what you said before arguing your point, BUT ARE YOU just giving Lestat all of those godly power and James Bond nothing? Are YOU pointing out that Lestat can not be defeat unless the lack of blood, which mean it will be in the year after never? Are YOU implying that James Bond can't use anything to assist him in a battle, where Lestat already started with full-blood count? Are YOU even thinking what James Bond COULD do to defeat Lestat, but YOU treated like a god Lestat is!?

NO! All you ever did state that Lestat can NEVER be killed by James Bond simply because YOU NEVER GAVE JAMES ANYTHING TO START WITH. YOU ALREADY GAVE LESTAT TO ABILITY TO FIGHT, YET YOU NEVER GAVE ANYTHING TO JAMES BOND. (Sorry for the caps lock but I feel that it was a must-need important piece of information.)

Originally posted by Rogue
Nope. Not a joke. Most of the vampires of Anne Rice's books consider immortality in their capacity to be a curse. They don't like having to feed on the living and only being able to exist in the dreary night. It's the reason why many find Rice's vampires fascinating; that they experience depression and are philosophical.

Great, there are other people who are exactly the same way but instead of humans, Rice decided to make it vampire. Hurray for human not being philosophical. Hurray for human not being able to experience depression. Hurray for the fact that even vampire are very less like human, but ignoring all of those facts that human also have a soul as well.

You think human are living in a blessing? You think vampire are living in a curse? You think these two things Rice want to be completely true? Some people would considered immortality a blessing, some claimed it as a curse. Some people hated being human, yet it is a blessing anyway. What made you think vampire are way different then human, when in fact they shared just same feeling we have? What made you think that vampire are so philosophical, when human can be the same way? What made you think that vampires are exiled in life, WHEN THERE ARE ALREADY VAMPIRE WANNA-BE SUPPORTING THEM?

Just because vampire have immortality does NOT make them immortal. Human also can be immortal, yet they do NOT HAVE immortality! Why did you gave Lestat all of these power, and James Bond nothing to fight with in the start? The facts remained...

Because YOU KNOW that Lestat already lost when he have NOT YET FEED ON BLOOD when the battle start. So when you gave Lestat the abilities TO FIGHT, James Bond get something else to hold off Lestat. Now you can't applied FIST TO FIST combat only, because Lestat would already got a bonus, but James does not.

Originally posted by Sparda
First of all, where are you getting the whole "there are two types of zombies, science and mystical" info from? And yes, you make a point with zombie. But interestingly enough, Lestat is not a zombie but in fact a vampire, which is not the same thing.

Interesting now to say this now... It was the word you said before: "Supernatural."

A zombie is a supernatural. Even they can revived back to life, they are very much like "men" because they DIE when their brain is blown off. Now if vampire are supernatural and they can't die, you also have to applies that being supernatural mean a such being have the power of immortality, thus, could never be killed. This means that every supernatural that ever to occur could never die, which is completely false and I have feeling you know about this.

However, just because you are supernatural does not guarantees to live forever. If this was true, every vampire in Rice's book would already taken over the world. The movie with zombie ended with zombie being victorious against human. The balance between right and wrong stayed balance, but all you ever see that angels and demons are being immortal and yet never feel ANY pain.

So being a supernatural vampire doesn't give Lestat every god-like power. In fact, you just gave him an good reason to win this tournament because of his ability to become impervious to ANY damages. But THIS kind of battle gave Lestat the ability to walk away with ANYTHING.

Why does he exists in this tournament anyway? I thought Cairoi does not want any character to have one-side tournament.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 03-29-07 01:41 AM, in CBMMW: Bond and Lestat! Link
Originally posted by BBQMissile
Seticus, there's no reason to act like a condescending whining bitch just because no one agrees with you.

Does it look like I cared?

Originally posted by Sparda
The whole point of the tournament is to see who's better.

If that was true, then stop acting like Lestat is a god anyway.

Originally posted by Sparda
Just because one character prevails over another doesn't mean that the victorious character is a "God Tier" character.

Geez, let see... You gave Lestat god-like speed with a god-like power and god-like endurence. James Bond is a human. I don't see how Lestat isn't your average tier if he can't be defeat in a battle if he already got is himself.

Originally posted by Sparda
Strange. I could've sworn it was you who said that the vampires are still men.

Okay. So? Are you going act like they are god now? Because that's what your doing now.

Originally posted by Sparda
First of all, the cap locks was completely unnecessary. And secondly, this is a complete and utter lie. Stop twisting everyone's words to suit your argument. We already assume James Bond has the gadgets and gizmos he uses in the movies just like we assume Lestat is already a vampire. To say that we never gave James anything to start with is a statement of pure ignorance.

In that case... Mind if I have access to everything James Bond got in the movie then?

Here are the things James Bond can use against Lestat:

- Shooting Cigarette.
- Radioactive lint
- Pocket snap trap
- Moonraker Laser
- Wristwatch
- Eye-glasses

Those are just enough.

Originally posted by Sparda
Right now, you're literally pulling words out of your own ass. Not once did i ever state that supernaturals cannot die. And no, i did not make Lestat impervious to any damage. It's simply within the context of this battle and this battle alone that leads me to believe that Bond doesn't stand a chance. Bond simply isn't capable of killing Lestat. This doesn't hold true for the other competitiors in this tournament. And according to your theory
dogs are men. Cats are men. Rats are men. Why? Cause they can all die.

Okay. Then why Rogue make impervious to any damages?

In fact, what made you think that Bond never stood the chance when some of these gadget are already there to counter every Lestat's action?

And according to your observation, be that way then.

Originally posted by Sparda
First of all, stop whining just because your point keeps getting shot down. Secondly, Cairoi is kind enough to spend his time to even make this tournament. You should be a bit more appreciative. And finally, Cairoi is only a man. Therefore, he makes mistakes.

And we can correct them too. In fact, why won't you do yourself a favor and explains why Lestat deserved to stay in this tournament because Rogue established that Lestat could not be killed except without the lack of blood, even though he can't be "killed"?

The thing is Sparda... You don't give Bond anything because we don't know what kind of gadgets that CAN help him, rather than WHAT COULD help him.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 03-29-07 02:19 AM, in CBMMW: Bond and Lestat! Link
Originally posted by BBQMissile
Your ignorance overwhelms me. And i am overwhelmed by my own foolishness; foolishness in thinking that i could even begin to reason with an ignorant, uncaring hypocrite such as yourself. Therefore, i extend my apologies to Cairoi for having even tried to present my case to Seticus in hopes that perhaps he might be more open to other viewpoints, but still keep his own and for pursuing the argument even further when Seticus decided to be a stubborn and unreasonable hardass.

Thank you for the insults, I just want you to know that I wanted detail by details, not just a simple straight out fact. You don't know what debate is, do you? I am listening to you, but you seem to have an intention to insult me when you saw my post.

I even told Cairoi that I already apologize because I wanted this to be a debate (so I would know better about Lestat) rather then just a battle. When there's a debate, there'll be more information, Sparda. Not just a battle.

I'm tired of hearing you calling me ignorance, when I wanted more details, more information, AND the reason why Lestat was granted immortality when anyone would have it. Just because he survives a cross-fire burn doesn't mean he'll become impervious to damage.

Not only that Sparda, you are also attempting to make me to go aggressive to LEARN something, but you made it sounds like I am the world hypocrite. You won't even go nice on me, because you're giving up. I don't care what the hell is your problem, but when you debate, you need stop with debate AGAINST human.

What happened if Lestat got blinded with a flash bang gadget? Those type of questions are still valid, are they not? The reason why I'm being "stubborn" is that in a real debate, there WILL be opponents that are like that. There will be unreasonable hardass people who NEED more INFORMATION to get the better idea.

If you're giving up, then let me say this, Sparda: The counter statement. Any way to kill Lestat other then just blood stravation. To proves those things that can mean more then what it is. Those things are what I am looking for. Rogue was doing good at debating and all, but there are some questions I wanted to know. Even if there are other people who thinks these information are useless, I don't.

But know what? You can leave for all I care, you can bitch at me because of how the way I see things, and I can agrees some of your statement about me being a stubborn type, ignorance type, and a unreasonable hardass type, but one time, I'll know not to be.

A hypocrite.

Another thing... Don't tell everyone what they are. Mostly because you probably won't see the way they can be.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 03-29-07 11:39 AM, in CBMMW: Bond and Lestat! Link
Originally posted by Clockworkz
Seticus, knock it off, man. Just stop.

Clock, we (Rogue, me, and maybe few others) are actually debating over it. So please, understand that we are arguing over the idea between these two guys, okay?

Originally posted by Desroth
If Lestat could be allowed to reform, then Bond has no chance in hell. Unless he can hold Lestat off for days (not likely, as Bond is human and would die of starvation as he never carries food with him).

Agreed there.

Originally posted by Desroth
"ITS IN THE BIBLE! IT HAS TO BE TRUE! NO ONE ELSE IS RIGHT!". Seriously, go out and research Lestat weaknesses and find the right combination of gadgets to win.

Flash bang, explosive, etc., are likely to stop Lestat temporary for a while. This give James Bond an upper hand if Lestat was blinded, and as far as I am concerned, vampires can still be blinded, right?
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-02-07 11:17 AM, in GET THEM OFF ME Link


Fact: You guys suck.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-04-07 11:30 AM, in When someone called you smart... Link
Does it ever make you feel like you are just opposite of intelligent? I do, sometime.

It really annoys me sometime because of how people tell me like I am. I'm not overreacting, just wondering why would people say that. Sure, it means the good thing but if you are "smart" like people tell you are, would you think of the word "genius" or just natural-smart? (In my opinion, I'm more of wisdom-type then intelligence-type.)

When it comes to something like tactic, I tends to enjoy it depending on it. In fact, one time when Desroth and I played chess, somewhere in the middle of the battle, he said, "I can defeat you in two turns." However, he didn't see ahead of the move I SHOULD make. It was just pure dumb luck that Desroth messed up in the end but we "tied" at some point there. But even when Desroth said that he could defeat me in two turns, does it makes me smart enough to avoid the situation I was in, that Desroth was telling me about?

When I was playing World of Warcraft at some point against a 7-years-old, he claimed that I was smart for defeating him in 2 v.s. 2 and 1 v.s. 1 duel. Just because I beat him doesn't make ME smart. It is matter of reflex and work that you can do. Anyone would know not to waste two healing items unless you need them when you are on low health. How does that make me smart?

Even on GaiaOnline, I was talking to someone about how role-playing SHOULD be, instead of how people WANT them to be. Sure, you want them to be fun, but shouldn't it be very focused on the plot? You want it to be easy to understand, but should you make one sentence post, ignoring how your character is in that position? It is not like one simple action, such as sighing, just staring at each other, or any stationary action* will change the whole storyline. Where's the emotion, the environment, and what makes the character special?

In fact, here's where I speak about the RP/Story:


- Heavy focused plot. Having some "gaiden" quest/plot may help if you are using some minor characters to help focus on the storyline.

- Usage of variety of minor character. I'm not saying to give every minor character a major role but as least give them what make them very unique to the role play/story. In fact, Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance gaves several minor characters for YOU to choose, and in Fire Emblem: Goddess of Dawn, they gave those minor characters an important role. Such an good example would be Nephenee/Brom chapter. (When you see Nephenee and Brom in Path of Radiance, they are prisoner who can be recuited for the next chapter. In Goddess of Dawn, they have their own chapter to fight against the rebels who think that they should be the new heroes.)

- Description. Quality, not quanity. Right? The problem is that several people can abuse it so much that it can be mistranslated. The quality of the post is the emotion of your character, or the uniqueness. The quanity of your post is the paragraph(s) of your action, dialogue, and description. These two are more important as one would fail without the other. Just because you made one sentence doesn't make the story will advance like so. If you are going to say one sentence, it possibly is not going to do anything!



After this person read it, she said that I was smart enough to think something like that. But does this make me smart enough to figures this out? No, it is just something I wanted in a RP/story, or how to use each item/attack effective during a battle, or an ploy to confusion your opponent so that they THINK they are winning.

Just because I played alot of tactic video games or role-play less over time, doesn't guaranteed to make me smart. But if people said that I am smart, it's okay by me but I don't believes that I have an IQ of a genius yet. What's your opinion?

* - What I mean by stationary action is that action that doesn't gave much major change and is likely to have no impact on a storyline. If you are sighing for one post and say "I'm bored.", it is likely you aren't doing anything. Or if you walked over to the particular area then returned to the same spot for no reason, it is also likely you aren't doing anything to help the storyline to proceed either.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-04-07 02:12 PM, in Videogame Otaku? Link
Like everyone else, I could draw a map of Fire Emblem, then I don't even have to actually draw it. Everyone's point is?

Video Games I DO love:

- Fire Emblem. (Ike can do the Kill Bill.)
- Granstream Saga. (Eon can copy any item and use it. Resize it, restore it, etc.)
- Tactic Orge. (The story is pretty interesting. Throwing rocks for the win.)
- Baten Kaitos. (Light flare! Light flare! Magic! Bell~~!) (Shut up, wretches!)

- Fire Emblem. From The Dragon of Darkness and the Sword of Light to Goddess of Dawn. From pantless Marth to Ike. Sure, I haven't beat all of them yet but I did beat Fire Emblem 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Genealogy of the Holy War is still my favorite (yay for Uber broken character. I love Sety|Levin with Holsety.) and Ike for his powerful stat.

- Granstream Saga. Let's try this way. If you are guy with an ancient artifacts that have the power to restore an object back to it original state, can store it in the artifacts, to copy the particular object, and do amazing shit with it, I would be fucking rich in no time. Too bad, you have to save the islands and pick a chick to save in the end.

- Tactic Orge. I can't tell which one is for PS1 but this one time, I was fighting a woman of her two sisters I recuited and killed her with a bow out of range. That's right, I killed her out of my shooting range with a fricken bow. In the end, I didn't get her. :O But she was a bitch anyway.

Anyway, Tactic Orge is about a war against an empire/country. At a certain point, you have to make a decision where YOU can be lawful, chaos, or neutral. I happened to take chaos way and the sister you have isn't your sister. She's a princess and at some point, you can fight her or not. If you didn't kill her, you have to choose two options (and if you got the correct one, you got another two options) to recuits her into your team party. Basically, it is a war that gone wrong at some point.

- Baten Kaitos: The Lost Ocean and Eternal Wing. Baten Kaitos: Origins. These two cards-based game seem weird but you can go from "hey, I suck with 4 cards." to "Holy, shit, I only got 7 cards but my timer went to 3 seconds to react!" What make me so interested in this is based on unique battle system where you have to learn how to kick ass and nuke those bitch.... I mean, WRETCH bitches into pieces. I mean, if my dad played this and have to pick a card while 3-sec timer start, he'll be like: FUCK, I'm slow.

Same with my brother. "Uh... Chrono blow, chrono blow, chrono blow, chrono blow... Uh... Crap. ACTIVATE THIS SPECIAL ATTACK!" (He wasted 3 seconds thinking out loud. Then he lost his turn.) I'm getting started on Origins.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-04-07 02:31 PM, in When someone called you smart... Link
Originally posted by Nagis
It makes sence about you playing Tactic games alot. It dosent make you smart, it makes you more logical dude.

Funny, my Oxford American Desk Dictionary and Thesaurus said that logical is intelligent in a similar meaning. Intelligent is similar to being smart. However, I get your point.

Are you trying to say that in categories, there are things we are smart about and thing we have no flying fucking clue about? Such as math, history, english, etc.?
Originally posted by Nagis
About roleplaying on Gaiaonline, its a big fat fucking joke there. You just need to join a guild that has literate roleplaying and go at it. I know of a few guilds that would love to have you there, so Ill talk to them for you if you want me to.

No thank. But it is very generous of you.

However, the word "smart" have lost it bearing when it can be proven false. Hell, would it be even better to say that I have more wisdom then in intelligence? Even logic couldn't help wisdom since one is word of science and the other is word of moral. Even with wisdom, you still need the brain of common sense as much as logic does.

Beside, what the hell is up with genius? It's not like they are right in every categories in education, which, in my opinion is pure bullshit. However, watching The Edge, even genius are depressed if they are billionaires.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-04-07 10:20 PM, in Leeeeeroy Jeeeenkins Link
Originally posted by youtube
The url contained a malformed video id.


And no, you're beating a dead horse already. It already spread around so fast that... I swear to god the next person who will say that Leeroy Jerkin "is the shit" will immediately get their ass stitches!

But no. I don't love it. The fact is, I already seen it so much... It's ridiculous to watch a dumb video like that. I mean, how the hell does this guy get so popular when anyone else could have done it?
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-05-07 11:03 AM, in Leeeeeroy Jeeeenkins Link
Originally posted by xXXx Gaara xXXx
its the fact about the chicken at the end that makes it the best. His line of "well at lest i have chicken" thats teh part i love.

"Well, as least, I HAD chicken." If he came back while AFK, it would be more sense that he would already ate the chicken. Plus, I wouldn't really save his ass. Most players aren't stupid enough to ignore the plan. (Beside, you can see the countdown.)

Secondly, I know many people will think I am bitching at a joke, but I'm bitching at a joke that is already overused.

No, this is way worse then Aqua Teen Hunger Force version of flaming chicken is based on from someone's actual version of flaming grizzly bears.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-10-07 12:36 PM, in Shogun Wars Link
Probably fun game for most people to play.

Sure, it seem like one of those game where it takes patience and shit, but overall, you can have fun playing game like this.

http://shogunwars.com/register.php?commander=Seticus
(The codes are not working.) If anyone decided to sign up, make sure you are my commander. This way, I can give you some troops (I think) to begin with.

Desroth and I just started playing this and this can be one of the game where you can check frequently while you guys are chatting over here.


(Last edited by Seticus on 04-10-07 03:43 PM)
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-11-07 07:58 PM, in When someone called you smart... Link
Originally posted by Elara
Take the compliment and let it go.

The problem is that it must be a fact rather then a compliment. If I was smart, it would be established as a complete fact that I am current "genius" at some point where I was completely right.

Elara, let try it this way. If I kept saying that you are smart over a period of time, it would technically lose its meaning. As Nagis said:


Look at Albert Einstein, he was logical in science, but he sucked big time when it came to numbers.


It's not like he is really "smart" in life but has his intelligence into science. When you say it to me, I would feel like that the people is more wrong because the word does not seem to be applies accurately to the fact about me. It would be saying like that mental-retard could be "smart" and a genius "dumb" instead of the other way around. If it was someone's opinion, then it would have said: "Yeah, that seem more logical. Hey Elara, you seem to know about these stuff," rather then a established fact: "Hey Elara, you are smart about math."

If you even know geometric, you would already know what you learned from it, but it doesn't qualifies as being smart since you may not know trig or how limits work.

See what I mean? Saying that someone is smart make it seem more like a fact whereas the person may not have that intelligence yet.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-12-07 10:34 AM, in When someone called you smart... Link
Originally posted by Logos
I was just a bit worried since if I remember straight, Seticus used to be of of the least odd sounding people on the board.

I was one of the least odd sounding people? Never knew that. O_o What am I right now, if you don't mind answering? (If you said that I am more odd right now, I'll would agree with you there since I have a weird brain pattern.)

Originally posted by Logos
And why are you talking funny?

Either my grammar sucks or you must have drinking. Chances are, it would be the first one.

Anyway, what I am trying to say that being called smart isn't an actual fact, since people can uses the term to express their feeling but not your. Think as this way, if someone called you smart for only solving one difficult problem, how would you know that any other people could have done it if they knew the same problem?

Unless someone take an IQ test, you can't really say that so-and-so are smart because of their ability to think more critically. Anyone could have think the same. What I am trying to say that being smart isn't really good compliment if the next thing came to the worse and you failed the class.

I know people have to make mistakes to learn from it but how does the hell being called smart is better when people could do the same thing?
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-12-07 01:04 PM, in I know some people dont find Tourettesguy funny... Link
I know this video isn't related to the Tourettes guy but...



As least that guy gave people some tourettes. O_o (I know it isn't possible but still. It's funny.)
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-12-07 08:55 PM, in 300 Poke! Link


Made of pure win.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-13-07 11:18 AM, in Guys, save me Link
Tokyo Majin Gakuen Kenpuchou. In summary, using the full main opening.


In short, if you are looking for something school-related, demon-fighting with magic and stuff, and I think what is well thought-out plotline, give this a whirl.

Hell, there are ZOMBIES in the first episodes (OMFGWTFPWNAGE!) and I just started watching it. (I think it is semi-new.)
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-13-07 11:20 AM, in Lingo Link
Stack.

No points please.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-13-07 11:30 AM, in Lingo Link
Shack.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-13-07 05:10 PM, in When someone called you smart... Link
I agree with you there. You can be smart for only belief time, but in anything else, you are just whoever you are. Not smart but not stupid either, just what you are.
Rauni









Since: 08-14-04

Since last post: 1343 days
Last activity: 1343 days
Posted on 04-14-07 11:17 AM, in Guys, save me Link
Originally posted by Odin
Looks kind of Shonen like if you ask me ...

Genres: Horror, Shounen, Supernatural

And as far as I am concerned, who the fuck would judges stuff by appearance/genre? If it's good, it's good. You don't need to go: "Wow, those people are just too cute, they might go: 'Hey, ladies, check what I can do.'" No, they goes: "Hey, ladies, shut the fuck up, I'm trying to work here."

PC load letter? What does the fuck does that mean?

Originally posted by Odin
Its too addicting...

No... Just NO.

If you were addicted to it, you would have fangasm over it like how I did with Fire Emblem. Chances are: you aren't.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by Rauni



xeogaming.org

AcmlmBoard 1.92++ r4 Baseline
?2000-2013 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper, DarkSlaya*, Lord Alexandor*
*Unofficial Updates
Page rendered in 0.213 seconds.
0.038